New 9/11 photos 'prove WTC exploded from inside'

Emilaset Says:

May 26, 2012 - 3:36 GO SWEDISH DUDE! arbeit macht frei! xD

blindedby2monkeys Says:

May 26, 2012 - and this will convince you it was mossad and or israel, it convinced me, how about you? thumb up to spread this - /watch?v=IQqWM0nRRPU

homerbear46 Says:

May 25, 2012 - ..Fact 2, please explain how a 100m horizontally is "well within the range" of a gravity ONLY driven "falling" object? Otherwise go have "fun" in UR "fantasy world" You stupid fuck.

homerbear46 Says:

May 25, 2012 - Yep...you talk a load of shit, get 4 thumbs for it,(like EVERY trolling "debunkernut" does) then say u have no fake (sock) accounts, and don't give a shit about ticks (cos you're so "cool" & are way "above"such pettiness) Fact 1`"fires & damage" do NOT account for the "collapse" of B7 (at 100%CD speed) Newton's 3rd Law kiddo...LEARN IT. * there is NO evidence of the severe damage or intense inferno debunkers LIE about, it isn't even shown on the fraudulent NIST "simulation"..

airkooled05 Says:

May 24, 2012 - People are waking up all over . They dont buy the story of Muslims with box cutters does not wash . Stay the course and ignore the haters and name callers . They are here to distract you . This is your nation . You built it with your sweat and dollars . You have a right to the truth . Not some story they made up . Stay the course . Be safe . peace

12weasel100 Says:

May 24, 2012 - well at least you are pretty much admitting you have no facts and are basing all your shit of your bullshit opinion. Now for the next step you should seek professional help to escape your deluded fantasy world. Your so called "important points" have been explained.  You dumb shit.

billy7connor Says:

May 23, 2012 - Many of the answers can only be answered by the government - who aren't answering them :) there is no "random shit" , there's quite important points that need explanation :)

12weasel100 Says:

May 23, 2012 - Well that is what is so fucking hilarious about you stupid assholes. After 10yrs you are still "asking questions" One would think after 10yrs you would have found answers and would be able to list of a long list of facts that logically explains and proves your shitty little theory. So if you are only asking questions why not logically explain why you are asking the questions you are asking. or are you just spewing out random shit thoughts with no reason behind it. You dumbass

billy7connor Says:

May 23, 2012 - As i said - they don't prove anything - they make people ask questions. Why did WTC 7 collapse when WTC 3,4,5,6 took more damage? You can't prove anything by saying this "could happen" :P !!

MrEcologyDK Says:

May 22, 2012 - 2000 new photos? from where ....?

floydcz1 Says:

May 22, 2012 - After watching September Clues, I have to say my opinion is now that all the video footage available has been messed with and the buldings were hit with missiles and CGI used to mask the missiles to fool the watching world into believing planes hit the towers then explosives to bring them down. Too many errors and way too many coincidences.

12weasel100 Says:

May 22, 2012 - (continued) Fact 3- there was plenty of soft metals that were in and around the towers that could have melted it is no suprise however it is an illogical statement to make. Logically explain how "pools of molten metals" is supposed to prove controlled demo when no controlled demo ever does this. So when asked to provide facts you spew out shit and illogical statements. You fail again you retard.

12weasel100 Says:

May 22, 2012 - Profession engineers and meturalogists know exactly how steel reacts when heated. They inspected the beams and trusses Fact 1- WTC7 may not have been hit by a plane but it was hit but WTC1 or how would you logically explain the fires and damage. Magic?? Fact 2- WTC7 was across the road about 350ft from WTC1 well within the range of WTC1 (continued)

billy7connor Says:

May 22, 2012 - But how the steel in the WTCs reacted to the heat, how the steel structures collapsed in the WTCs - Nobody knows. Fact 1 - No plane hit WTC 7 Fact 2 - WTC 7 was the furthest of the WTC buildings from the twin towers Fact 3 - There were pools of molten metal at the base of the WTC after the collapse They don't prove anything but they do make people ask questions about the government story :)

Tetrahedral101 Says:

May 22, 2012 - So i did! 12weasel is a bigot!!

HellRehab Says:

May 22, 2012 - If everybody on Youtube who isn't qualified to talk about structural engineering and science would stop arguing about structural engineering and science it would be helpful. Debunkers are wasting their time. Real scientists have published peer-reviewed articles about the collapses. The vast majority of them leave no room for a controlled demolition. Who is this schmuck on RT and why is he even being interviewed?

12weasel100 Says:

May 21, 2012 - medicine is not structural engineering However like most truthers you are probably fucking lying anyway and if you are not and your friend who is a doctor believes 911 was a huge conspiracy and WTC was controlled demo then I pray for the safety and lives of anyone that visits him The properties of steel, how steel reacts to heat, steel fame structures have collapsed before due to fire, design of WTC, inward bowing and twisting of columns etc etc are all facts. Where are your facts you have none

floydcz1 Says:

May 21, 2012 - @Tetrahedral you are wasting your time with 12weasel because he is infact a Weasel, self opionionated gobshite.

billy7connor Says:

May 21, 2012 - My friend has a 1st degree in medicine - he's not an idiot :) please tell these facts that prove fire collapsed the tower :D there are quite a few facts that make people ask questions about the event - though i do agree there are many theories based on opinions :)

xadam2dudex Says:

May 20, 2012 - Manny Badillo is a terrible spokes person ..he stumbles all over the place..isn't there somebody who can speak clearly ?

12weasel100 Says:

May 20, 2012 - Gravity and Evolution are also theories however they are scientific theory that are supported with facts and underlying principles. Fire caused the collapse and is also supported with facts and underlying principle so people with a proper education can say what happened. Truthers however lack facts and an education and need to rely on philsophical theory supported by only opinions, speculation, lies and edited footage. Truthers are fucking idiots.

billy7connor Says:

May 20, 2012 - Jeez - try to be nice and you get insulted :P and there are theories as to why the building collapsed due to fires, not facts. No-body can say exactly what happened to the building

12weasel100 Says:

May 20, 2012 - There are more than enough facts to prove fire caused the collapse. If you are not smart enough to understand them then it does not mean they are not there. Besides your response was pointless it is completely irrelevant what anyone else sates. It will not make your shit lies true. Only facts regardless of what anyone else claims will prove your shitty theory and not truther has ever been able to provide any facts. You dumbass.

billy7connor Says:

May 20, 2012 - Though on the other hand there are no facts to clearly prove collapse due to fire :)

ozbillybong Says:

May 20, 2012 - ill have some of that opium whats there dealers number .